Medical · College PredictorEnter your rank or marks above. You'll get a college list sorted into three bands — colleges you're safe for, colleges where it's a genuine contest, and colleges that are a reach. No login wall before your numbers. No false precision. Just the honest math, which is the rest of this page.
Try also: Rank Predictor → · Cutoff Target → · Exam Details →
Enter your rank or marks above. You'll get a college list sorted into three bands — colleges you're safe for, colleges where it's a genuine contest, and colleges that are a reach. No login wall before your numbers. No false precision. Just the honest math, which is the rest of this page.
2L+
cutoff data points
7yr+
cutoff history
51+
exams covered
Try also: NEET Rank Predictor 2026 → · NEET Cutoff Target → · Exam Details →
NEET: National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test · College Predictor 2026
Medical · College Predictor · 2026
A NEET College Predictor is an online tool that estimates which MBBS, BDS, or AYUSH colleges you can realistically get into, based on your NEET rank, category, domicile state, and quota preference. It does not guarantee a seat. What a well-built predictor does is convert years of real counselling data into a probability-weighted shortlist — so you enter choice-filling with a strategy instead of a hope.
Here is the minimum it needs from you, and why each input is non-negotiable:
| Input | What It Determines | Why It Cannot Be Skipped |
|---|
| NEET Rank (AIR) | Your position in the national merit list | Every college closes at a rank, never at raw marks |
| Category | UR / OBC-NCL / EWS / SC / ST / PwD | Each category has its own separate closing rank |
| Domicile State | State Quota eligibility | 85% of all seats are reserved for a state's own students |
| Course | MBBS / BDS / BAMS / BUMS / BSMS / BHMS | Each course is a separate seat pool with its own cutoffs |
| Quota | AIQ (15%) vs State Quota (85%) | The same college can close at wildly different ranks under each |
| Gender | Female / Male / Transgender | Some institutions run horizontal gender reservations |
The output — a college list ranked by your odds — is only ever as trustworthy as the data behind it and the honesty of the caveat attached to it. That second part is exactly where most of the internet fails you, and exactly where this page won't.
Status, May 2026: The original NEET UG 2026 exam on May 3 was cancelled after a paper leak. The re-exam is confirmed for June 21, 2026. If you're using a predictor right now to plan, the next section explains precisely what the cancellation does to your prediction's reliability. Read it first. It is the single most important thing on this page this year.
This is the section nearly every other predictor page hasn't updated. Read it before you trust a single number from any tool — ours included.
NEET UG 2026 was scheduled for May 3, 2026. More than 22.79 lakh candidates registered — the largest cohort in the exam's history — across roughly 5,400 centres in 551 Indian cities and 14 cities abroad. On May 12, 2026, the National Testing Agency cancelled the exam. The trigger: allegations of a coordinated question-paper leak, including reports of a circulating "guess paper" with 400-plus questions and 120-plus Biology matches. The Central Bureau of Investigation registered an FIR covering criminal conspiracy, cheating, criminal breach of trust, and offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Let that sink in. One exam. Twenty-two lakh aspirants. Cancelled. There is no recent precedent at this scale.
The NTA, with the Government of India's approval, has confirmed the re-examination for Sunday, June 21, 2026, 2:00 PM to 5:15 PM IST. The essentials:
This is the calendar a predictor user actually needs — not the pre-cancellation one still sitting on most competitor pages.
| Milestone | Date / Window | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Original exam (cancelled) | May 3, 2026 | Cancelled — paper leak |
| Cancellation announced | May 12, 2026 | Confirmed |
| Re-NEET 2026 exam | June 21, 2026 | Confirmed by NTA |
| Fresh admit card | ~Mid-June 2026 | Expected — watch neet.nta.nic.in |
| Re-NEET result | Late June – early July 2026 | Tentative |
| MCC AIQ Round 1 | July 2026 | Expected (~4–6 weeks later than a normal cycle) |
| MCC Round 2 | August 2026 | Expected |
| Mop-Up Round | September 2026 | Expected |
| Stray Vacancy Round | October 2026 | Expected |
| State counselling | August–October 2026 | Per individual state announcements |
Every post-result date here is an estimate based on prior cycles and is unconfirmed. The only authoritative sources are neet.nta.nic.in, mcc.nic.in, and your state counselling authority.
Here's the uncomfortable truth other pages skip because it slightly dents their tool's marketing.
Every predictor on the internet is built on the past. It assumes 2026 looks roughly like 2023, 2024, and 2025 — similar paper difficulty, similar candidate psychology, similar completion patterns. The re-exam quietly breaks several of those assumptions at once.
Paper difficulty may move. A new paper, set under intense CBI and public scrutiny, comes from a different question-setting environment. It could get harder — as a signal of tightened security — or softer, under pressure to be seen as fair. Either direction bends the marks-to-rank curve, and that curve is the spine of every prediction.
Candidate behaviour is genuinely unknown. Some who sat the May 3 paper have lost rhythm or morale. Others are sharper now, drilling targeted revision for seven extra weeks. The performance distribution of the June 21 cohort is, honestly, not knowable in advance.
The result-to-counselling window compresses. A later result means a tighter run-up to choice-filling deadlines. If you haven't done your counselling homework yet, the clock is now shorter than it usually is.
Institutional uncertainty persists. Petitions on NEET integrity sit before multiple courts. Exemption demands — including a request from Tamil Nadu to allow Class 12 marks as the 2026 basis — remain pending. Nothing official has changed. But the environment is unsettled, and a serious planner factors that in.
So what do you actually do with a prediction this year? Treat it as scenario planning, not forecasting. Run three versions: your realistic performance, a five-percent-better result, and a five-percent-worse one. Build a separate college list for each. Then widen every safety margin you'd normally keep — list more "safe" and "moderate" colleges than you would in a calm year. In 2026, the planner who over-prepares the safety net is the one who sleeps at night.
The hours and weeks following the NEET exam are often defined by intense anxiety, endless refreshing of answer keys, and the psychological need for validation—commonly referred to in student forums like Reddit as "hopium." When you search for a NEET College Predictor, you aren't just looking for a data point; you are looking for clarity amidst chaos.
Students often face a barrage of conflicting opinions: one coaching institute predicts a massive cutoff drop, while another warns of rank inflation. The reality is that post-exam anxiety makes aspirants vulnerable to misleading predictions. This guide is built to cut through that noise. We focus on brutal honesty and data-driven guidance so you can move from anxiety to a concrete, strategic plan.
Every predictor page on the internet says "advanced algorithm" and stops there. Almost none show the machinery. We will — because understanding the logic is the only way to know when the output deserves your trust and when it deserves a raised eyebrow.
You enter your expected or actual score out of 720. The predictor converts it to an estimated All India Rank using historical marks-vs-rank distributions. The percentile relationship is:
Percentile = ((Total Candidates − Your Rank + 1) ÷ Total Candidates) × 100
Estimated AIR ≈ Total Candidates × (1 − Percentile / 100) + 1
In practice the conversion runs off a lookup curve fitted on 3–5 years of NTA-published marks-vs-rank data. But here's the nuance most tools quietly bury: NEET ranking is not pure total marks. When two candidates tie on total, NTA breaks it with a cascade:
It affects only a thin band of borderline candidates — but if you're sitting exactly on a closing rank, the tie-break is the difference between a seat and a heartbreak. A predictor that ignores it isn't wrong for most people; it's just silent about the people it's most likely to mislead.
Your AIR is your position among all candidates. Your category rank is your position among candidates of your category only. Counselling cutoffs for reserved categories are quoted in category rank, so this conversion is essential. A predictor that only reasons in AIR — and several do — systematically misreads options for OBC, EWS, SC, and ST candidates.
This is the heart of it. The tool takes your estimated rank and compares it against the opening and closing ranks of each college, for each course, under each quota, for each category, in each counselling round — typically over the last 3 to 5 years.
Why closing rank and not marks? Because a college doesn't admit "everyone above 600." It admits candidates in rank order until its seats run out. The last admitted candidate's rank — the closing rank — is the real boundary. Marks are a proxy; the rank is the law.
Why does the round matter? Because closing ranks loosen as counselling progresses. A college might close Round 1 at rank 12,000 and Stray Vacancy at 19,000 as higher-ranked candidates upgrade away. A predictor that only uses Round 1 data underestimates your real options badly. A good one shows you round-wise behaviour.
A serious predictor doesn't return a flat yes/no. It buckets each college:
A prediction is an estimate with a confidence interval, and the interval is honest only if you know what widens it:
A predictor that hides these is selling certainty it doesn't have. One that names them is handing you the instructions for using it well.
If you've visited multiple prediction tools, you've likely seen vastly different rank or college estimates for the exact same score. This is a common source of frustration on student forums. Why does this happen?
This is why you must treat any prediction as a hypothesis, not a guarantee. Use tools that are transparent about their data sources and historical constraints.
This is the asset students screenshot, share, and search for at 1 a.m. — "650 marks NEET rank," "550 marks kitni rank." Here it is, built from NEET 2023, 2024, and 2025 actuals, and — unlike the over-confident tables elsewhere — presented as bands, not false single-point promises.
A blunt warning before the numbers: NEET 2026's re-exam means this year's curve could shift more than usual. Use the table as a directional map, not a GPS pin.
| NEET Marks (/720) | AIR — Optimistic | AIR — Expected | AIR — Conservative |
|---|---|---|---|
| 700 – 720 | 1 – 60 | 1 – 120 | 1 – 250 |
| 680 – 699 | 60 – 600 | 120 – 1,100 | 250 – 1,800 |
| 660 – 679 | 600 – 2,000 | 1,100 – 3,200 | 1,800 – 4,800 |
| 640 – 659 | 2,000 – 5,500 | 3,200 – 8,000 | 4,800 – 11,000 |
| 620 – 639 | 5,500 – 11,000 | 8,000 – 16,000 | 11,000 – 22,000 |
| 600 – 619 | 11,000 – 20,000 | 16,000 – 27,000 | 22,000 – 36,000 |
| 580 – 599 | 20,000 – 33,000 | 27,000 – 43,000 | 36,000 – 55,000 |
| 560 – 579 | 33,000 – 50,000 | 43,000 – 64,000 | 55,000 – 80,000 |
| 540 – 559 | 50,000 – 72,000 | 64,000 – 90,000 | 80,000 – 1,12,000 |
| 520 – 539 | 72,000 – 98,000 | 90,000 – 1,22,000 | 1,12,000 – 1,50,000 |
| 500 – 519 | 98,000 – 1,30,000 | 1,22,000 – 1,60,000 | 1,50,000 – 1,95,000 |
| 450 – 499 | 1,30,000 – 2,10,000 | 1,60,000 – 2,60,000 | 1,95,000 – 3,20,000 |
| 400 – 449 | 2,10,000 – 3,30,000 | 2,60,000 – 4,10,000 | 3,20,000 – 5,10,000 |
| 350 – 399 | 3,30,000 – 5,00,000 | 4,10,000 – 6,30,000 | 5,10,000 – 7,80,000 |
| 300 – 349 | 5,00,000 – 7,40,000 | 6,30,000 – 9,30,000 | 7,80,000 – 11,50,000 |
Notice what the table screams: between roughly 540 and 620, a swing of just 5–10 marks moves your rank by thousands. That's the steep zone — where candidate density is highest and where small exam-day differences detonate into very different college lists. It's also exactly the zone where a re-exam's difficulty shift hurts most.
Visualizing the candidate density cliff (540-620 marks).
X-Axis: NEET Marks | Y-Axis: Density of Candidates (Red zone indicates extreme density)
Category rank runs ahead of AIR because each category is a smaller pool. These multipliers are approximate and drift year to year, but they're directionally reliable for planning.
| Your AIR (approx.) | OBC-NCL Rank ≈ | EWS Rank ≈ | SC Rank ≈ | ST Rank ≈ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | 5,500 – 7,000 | 1,500 – 2,500 | 1,200 – 2,000 | 500 – 900 |
| 50,000 | 28,000 – 34,000 | 8,000 – 11,000 | 6,500 – 9,000 | 2,800 – 4,200 |
| 1,00,000 | 56,000 – 66,000 | 17,000 – 22,000 | 14,000 – 18,000 | 6,000 – 8,500 |
| 2,00,000 | 1,12,000 – 1,30,000 | 35,000 – 44,000 | 30,000 – 38,000 | 13,000 – 18,000 |
| 4,00,000 | 2,25,000 – 2,60,000 | 72,000 – 88,000 | 62,000 – 78,000 | 28,000 – 38,000 |
If you're a reserved-category candidate, this is the number that decides your real options — not your AIR. A predictor that doesn't convert it is doing you a quiet disservice.
If you remember one concept from this entire page, make it this one. It is the single most expensive misunderstanding in Indian medical admissions.
The qualifying cutoff is set by NTA. It's a percentile threshold — 50th percentile for UR, 40th for reserved categories — that simply makes you eligible to enter counselling. Clearing it means you "passed" NEET. It does not, by itself, get you a seat. Not even close.
The admission cutoff is the closing rank at which a specific college, course, quota, and category actually ran out of seats. This is the number that decides whether you get in. It is almost always dramatically higher than the qualifying bar.
A General-category candidate scoring around 150 clears the qualifying cutoff. The same candidate is nowhere near a government MBBS seat, where realistic admission cutoffs sit hundreds of marks higher. Confusing the two has wrecked more counselling strategies than any single other error.
| Category | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 (expected) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UR / EWS | 715–117 | 720–137 | 720–162 | 686–144 | ~700–135 to ~720–150* |
| OBC | 116–93 | 136–107 | 161–127 | 143–113 | ~145–110* |
| SC | 116–93 | 136–107 | 161–127 | 143–113 | ~145–110* |
| ST | 116–93 | 136–107 | 161–127 | 143–113 | ~145–110* |
| UR / EWS-PwBD | 116–105 | 136–121 | 161–144 | 143–127 | ~145–125* |
| OBC/SC/ST-PwBD | 104–93 | 120–107 | 143–127 | 126–113 | ~128–110* |
2026 figures are estimates pending the re-exam. The qualifying cutoff swings with paper difficulty and candidate volume; the 2024→2025 drop (General 720–162 down to 686–144) followed a moderately difficult paper and a smaller qualified pool.
For NEET 2025, the General-category admission cutoff for a government MBBS seat under All India Quota closed near AIR 26,000 (≈525 marks) — not the ~144 qualifying floor. That gap, roughly 380 marks wide, is the misconception. Anchor your planning to admission cutoffs and closing ranks. The qualifying cutoff is a turnstile, not a destination.
Here's a structural fact that determines your college list more than almost anything else, and that badly-built predictors routinely fumble: there isn't one cutoff per college. There are at least two.
| Dimension | All India Quota (AIQ) | State Quota |
|---|---|---|
| Seat share | 15% of government college seats | 85% of government college seats |
| Counselling body | Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) | Each state's own counselling authority |
| Domicile requirement | None — open to all Indian candidates | Yes — usually state domicile/residency |
| Competition pool | The entire national merit list | Mostly that state's own candidates |
| Also covers | AIIMS, JIPMER, ESIC, Central & Deemed (100%) | State govt + many private colleges in-state |
| Typical cutoff behaviour | Tighter (national pool) | Often more favourable for in-state candidates |
The consequence students miss: the same government college has a different closing rank under AIQ than under its state quota. State quota cutoffs for a college are frequently tens of thousands of ranks more forgiving for that state's own domicile candidates than the AIQ cutoff for the identical college. A 60,000-rank candidate locked out of a college via AIQ might walk into the same college comfortably through their home-state quota.
This is why a predictor that lumps everything into one number is not just imprecise — it's structurally misleading. It must reason about AIQ and your specific state quota as two separate tracks, because that's how the actual admission system works.
Your state domicile is arguably the single most powerful variable in your NEET prediction — more powerful than a 10-mark score improvement in many scenarios. The reason is simple: 85% of government MBBS seats are filled under state quota, and the number of seats available in each state varies dramatically.
Source: NMC-approved seat data for the 2025-26 academic session. Figures include both government and private/deemed medical colleges. Total national capacity has crossed ~1.29 lakh MBBS seats.
Total includes government + private + deemed colleges. National total: ~1.29 Lakh seats.
When the tool returns a list, mentally split it. Your AIQ options are your national reach — the only route to top central institutes, AIIMS-tier colleges, and out-of-state government seats. Your state-quota options are usually your highest-probability seats — the realistic backbone of your list. Strong strategy uses both tracks deliberately: chase ambition through AIQ, anchor security through state quota. Most students under-use their state quota because the predictor never made the distinction clear. Now you know to demand that it does.
This is the section students actually came for: "I'm scoring X — be honest, what's realistic?" No hype, no doom. Just the bands, by category and quota, with the kind of colleges each band genuinely opens.
Treat every range below as indicative, drawn from recent cycles, and softened further by the 2026 re-exam. The point isn't a guarantee. The point is a realistic mental model so you fill choices like a strategist instead of a gambler.
The top tier. AIIMS New Delhi and the senior AIIMS campuses, Maulana Azad Medical College, VMMC, top central institutes, the most competitive government colleges in any state. Under AIQ this is where the country's strongest candidates land. Reserved-category candidates with strong category ranks here have an exceptionally wide field. If you're here, your job isn't whether you get government MBBS — it's optimising which elite institute.
Excellent. Established government medical colleges across most states under AIQ, premier state government colleges through state quota, several newer AIIMS campuses for strong category ranks. Top central institutes get competitive at the lower end of this band for General, but state quota makes top state colleges very realistic. This is a comfortable government-MBBS band for most categories.
The strong-but-fight band. Solid government MBBS is realistic — more so through state quota than AIQ for General. OBC/EWS candidates with good category ranks have wide government options here; SC/ST candidates are very comfortably placed. AIQ government MBBS becomes genuinely accessible for reserved categories; General candidates lean on state quota and newer government colleges. This is the band where understanding AIQ-vs-state stops being academic and starts being the whole game.
The pivotal band — and the one where most aspirants actually sit. General-category government MBBS via AIQ is tight but not impossible at newer colleges; via state quota it's realistic in many states. OBC/EWS: government MBBS is achievable, especially in-state. SC/ST: comfortable government MBBS in most states. For General candidates near the lower end, this is the honest fork in the road — strong state-quota government chances, plus government BDS, government AYUSH, and well-regarded private/deemed options all on the table. None of those are consolation prizes; they're legitimate medical careers, and the rest of this section treats them that way.
Government MBBS for General gets hard via AIQ but stays alive through favourable state quotas, especially in larger states with many seats. OBC candidates retain real in-state government MBBS chances; SC/ST candidates still have meaningful government MBBS options in several states. Across categories, this band opens government BDS comfortably, government BAMS/BUMS/BSMS broadly, and competitive private/deemed MBBS for those with the budget. A 540 General candidate in a high-seat home state can still land government MBBS — which is exactly why blanket "you need 600+" advice is lazy and wrong.
Government MBBS for General via the open route is unlikely; reserved-category candidates may still find in-state government MBBS depending on state and category rank. Realistic and respectable here: government BDS in several states, government AYUSH broadly, private/deemed MBBS (budget permitting), and — for those open to it — MBBS abroad through properly vetted, NMC-aligned pathways. This is a real decision band, and a predictor that just says "no government MBBS" without showing the genuine alternatives has failed you.
Private and deemed MBBS (with the fee structure understood clearly), government and private BDS, government and private AYUSH, B.Sc. Nursing and allied health, and structured MBBS-abroad options. Reserved-category candidates should still check state-quota government BDS and AYUSH carefully — these can surprise on the upside.
Clearing the qualifying cutoff still keeps doors open: private/deemed BDS, AYUSH courses, B.Sc. Nursing and allied health programmes, and vetted overseas MBBS routes. Many strong careers in medicine begin precisely here. The honest move is to plan deliberately across these, not to fixate only on the one door that's closed.
| Marks Band | Approx. AIQ AIR | General | OBC/EWS | SC/ST | Realistic Best (General) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 680+ | 1 – 1,200 | Elite govt MBBS | Elite govt MBBS | Elite govt MBBS | Top AIIMS / MAMC-tier |
| 650–679 | 1,200 – 8,000 | Strong govt MBBS | Strong govt MBBS | Strong govt MBBS | Established govt medical college |
| 600–649 | 8,000 – 27,000 | Govt MBBS (state-leaning) | Wide govt MBBS | Comfortable govt MBBS | Govt MBBS via state quota |
| 550–599 | 27,000 – 64,000 | Tight AIQ / state realistic | Achievable govt MBBS | Comfortable govt MBBS | State-quota govt MBBS / newer govt |
| 500–549 | 64,000 – 1,60,000 | State-quota dependent | In-state govt MBBS likely | Govt MBBS in many states | Favourable-state govt MBBS / govt BDS |
| 450–499 | 1,60,000 – 2,60,000 | Govt MBBS unlikely | Possible in-state | Possible in-state | Govt BDS / AYUSH / private MBBS |
| 400–449 | 2,60,000 – 4,10,000 | Private/deemed MBBS | Govt BDS/AYUSH possible | Govt BDS/AYUSH possible | Private MBBS / govt BDS |
| <400 | 4,10,000+ | BDS/AYUSH/Nursing/abroad | Same, check state quota | Same, check state quota | BDS / AYUSH / allied / abroad |
A prediction is a demand-side estimate sitting on top of a supply-side reality. If you don't understand the seat matrix, you'll misread every number the tool gives you.
India has roughly 1.18–1.29 lakh MBBS seats across approximately 780–820 medical colleges. The broad split:
| Pool | Approx. Colleges | Approx. MBBS Seats | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government medical colleges | ~420–460 | ~58,000–60,000 | Most sought-after; lowest fees |
| Private medical colleges | ~260–290 | ~45,000–48,000 | Higher fees; cutoffs lower than govt |
| Deemed universities | ~50–55 | ~9,000–11,000 | 100% via MCC; high fees, lower cutoffs |
| Central / AIIMS / JIPMER | ~25+ | ~4,500–5,500 | Most competitive; 100% AIQ via MCC |
BDS adds roughly 27,000+ seats; AYUSH (BAMS/BUMS/BSMS/BHMS) adds tens of thousands more across government and private institutions.
New medical colleges and seat additions appear almost every year. Intuitively, more seats should mean easier admission — and at the margin, closing ranks do loosen slightly as capacity grows. But here's the catch the headlines miss: applicant volume has been rising at least as fast as seats. In 2025, around 22.09 lakh candidates appeared and roughly 12.36 lakh qualified (≈55.96%). For 2026, registrations crossed 22.79 lakh — the highest ever. More seats, but more aspirants chasing them. The competition doesn't soften just because the matrix grew; it often just shifts shape.
Registered ~22.7 lakh
↓
Appeared ~22.09 lakh
↓
Qualified ~12.36 lakh (≈55.96%)
↓
MBBS seats ~1.2 lakh (government + private + deemed)
Roughly twelve lakh students clear the bar. Just over a lakh MBBS seats exist. The funnel — not the qualifying cutoff — is the true picture of how competitive your rank really is. Every predictor output should be read against this shape.
Most predictor pages dead-end the moment they show you a list. That's where the actual danger begins. Students with brilliant ranks lose good seats every single year — not to low marks, but to counselling mistakes. A prediction that doesn't carry you into choice-filling is half a tool. So here's the other half.
You will likely run two counselling processes at once: MCC (for the 15% AIQ, plus 100% of AIIMS/JIPMER/ESIC/Central/Deemed) and your state's counselling (for the 85% state quota). They're separate registrations, separate schedules, separate fees. You can hold only one final seat — but you can play both tracks until you commit.
| Round | Who Participates | Exit Rule | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | All registered, eligible candidates | Free exit — don't report, no penalty | Deposit refunded; stay eligible for later rounds & state |
| Round 2 | Unallotted or those seeking upgrade | Restricted | Allotted + don't join → deposit forfeited, ineligible further |
| Mop-Up | Fills seats vacant after Round 2 | Strict | Exit usually forfeits seat and deposit |
| Stray Vacancy | Final leftover seats; no fresh registration | Final | Last chance; non-joining heavily penalised |
The single rule that costs students the most: Round 1 is a free exit; after a Round 2 allotment, leaving forfeits your security deposit and bars you from further rounds. Treat Round 2 choices as commitments, not experiments.
If you browse student forums, you'll inevitably encounter debates about massive "cutoff drops" in the Mop-Up or Stray Vacancy rounds. Many aspirants make the dangerous mistake of passing up a solid Round 2 seat, hoping that top-tier colleges will suddenly drop their closing ranks by thousands in the final rounds.
The Reality: While minor drops do occur as seats open up from candidates shifting colleges, massive drops are incredibly rare and heavily depend on unpredictable seat vacancies. The top-tier government medical seats are almost entirely locked by Round 2. Relying on a Stray Vacancy round miracle is a gamble that frequently leaves strong candidates entirely unallotted. Secure your realistic best seat early, and only use subsequent rounds for strategic upgrades if rules permit.
| Item | Government Colleges | Deemed Universities |
|---|---|---|
| Registration fee (non-refundable) | ~₹1,000 (Gen) / ~₹500 (SC/ST/PwD) | Higher slab |
| Security deposit (refundable*) | ~₹10,000 | ~₹2,00,000 |
Refundable if you don't get a seat or exit within the permitted rules. Forfeited if you're allotted and then abandon outside the free-exit window. Exact figures are set in the MCC information bulletin each cycle — verify before paying.
Keep originals plus multiple photocopies ready before counselling opens. The non-negotiable set:
A missing or wrong-format certificate at reporting can cost you an allotted seat. This is the most preventable failure in the entire process.
This is where the predictor's banding finally pays off. Build your choice list as a ladder, never a wishlist:
There's no cap on the number of choices in MCC choice-filling. Fill generously, in strict order of genuine preference, and lock only when you're sure. The algorithm gives you the highest choice it can reach — so an honest preference order is doing real work on your behalf.
It is vital to have an honest conversation about alternatives. What happens if your rank doesn't clear the government MBBS cutoff? Many students feel paralyzed by this scenario, but medicine offers multiple fulfilling pathways beyond a government MBBS seat.
Having a "Plan B" doesn't mean you are giving up on your goals; it means you are a smart strategist prepared for all outcomes.
This is the section the high-DA tool pages structurally can't write honestly — because candour here slightly undercuts their own lead magnet. We'll write it anyway. It's the whole reason to trust the rest.
For broad, mid-range estimation, a well-built predictor on good data is genuinely useful. If you're sitting at a rank well inside or well outside a college's historical closing rank, the call is robust — that's the "safe" and clearly-out-of-reach zones, and they're large. Predictors are also reliable for direction: which tier of colleges your rank belongs to, AIQ-vs-state contrast, category-rank implications. As a shortlisting and strategy instrument, it's the best tool you have before official cutoffs publish.
Be equally clear about the failure modes:
Treat the output as a probability band, not a verdict. Cross-check the "safe" and "moderate" colleges against the official opening/closing-rank PDFs MCC and your state release every round — those are ground truth; the predictor is the hypothesis. In 2026 specifically, widen every margin: assume your true position could be worse than the point estimate, and over-list safe options accordingly.
And our own tool? Same rules apply. The AG NEET College Predictor is built on multi-year MCC and state counselling data with round-wise closing ranks and category-rank conversion. It is still an estimate. It will be wrong at the margins, and it will be more uncertain in 2026 than in a stable year. We tell you that on the tool itself, not buried in a disclaimer footer, because a predictor that oversells its accuracy isn't a tool — it's a trap with a progress bar.
Searching for the "best" or "most accurate" NEET college predictor? The honest answer is that no tool can be perfectly accurate — so the real question is which one is built with the right priorities and tells you the truth about its limits. Apply this checklist to any predictor, including ours:
| Criterion | Why It Matters | What "Good" Looks Like |
|---|---|---|
| Data recency | Stale cutoffs mispredict badly | Uses the most recent completed cycle, all rounds |
| AIQ and state coverage | 85% of seats are state quota | Treats AIQ and your specific state separately |
| Round-wise data | Closing ranks loosen each round | Shows Round 1 → Stray behaviour, not one round |
| Category-rank handling | Reserved categories need category rank | Converts AIR → category rank explicitly |
| Probability bands | Yes/no hides real uncertainty | Returns Safe / Moderate / Reach, not a flat list |
| Methodology transparency | Black boxes can't be sanity-checked | States data sources and limitations openly |
| Honest caveats | Overconfidence misleads | Plainly states it's an estimate, more so in 2026 |
| No premature wall | Trust is earned before the lead form | Shows results before forcing OTP/login |
If a predictor scores well on data, coverage, transparency, and honesty — and is upfront that 2026 is a higher-uncertainty year — it's doing its job. If it promises precision and hides its method behind a phone-number wall, be skeptical regardless of how high it ranks on Google.
You can earn a strong rank and still lose a good seat. Every one of these is preventable. Most students make at least one.
Abstractions don't get anyone into medical college. People do. Here are three composite candidates using the predictor correctly in the 2026 context. Different scores, different categories, different states — same disciplined method.
His expected AIR lands around 16,000–22,000 (General), with the 2026 re-exam widening that. Through AIQ, General government MBBS at established colleges is a stretch — this is mostly his reach tier. Through Bihar state quota, government MBBS at solid state colleges is realistic; the in-state competition pool is far kinder than the national one. His ladder: a few ambitious AIQ government colleges at the top; the realistic core built from Bihar state-quota government colleges in honest preference order; a safe floor of newer state government colleges plus a strong government BDS option he'd genuinely accept. He runs the same list at a "5% worse" scenario and confirms the floor still holds. That last check is what separates a plan from a wish.
AIR roughly 64,000–90,000; OBC category rank materially better — likely in the high-30,000s to ~55,000 range. That category rank changes everything. Through Maharashtra state quota, OBC government MBBS at several state colleges is achievable; through AIQ, OBC government MBBS opens at newer colleges. Her ladder: ambitious AIQ OBC government seats at the top; the realistic core from Maharashtra state-quota OBC government MBBS; a safe base of government BDS and well-regarded government AYUSH she's genuinely open to. She doesn't fixate on a single dream college — she ranks ten she'd be happy at and lets the algorithm work. That's how moderate-band candidates win.
AIR around 1,80,000–2,40,000; SC category rank far stronger — potentially within ~30,000–40,000. Through Tamil Nadu state quota, SC government MBBS is genuinely in play at some colleges; if not MBBS, government BDS and government AYUSH are well within reach, not as fallbacks but as real careers. His ladder leads with state-quota SC government MBBS where the category rank reaches, then strong government BDS, then government AYUSH, then a vetted private option as a deep safety. He treats none of it as defeat — a government BDS or BAMS seat is a doctor's path, and he plans it with the same seriousness as MBBS. The predictor's job here isn't to crush or inflate. It's to show him, honestly, the several real doors that are open — and help him walk through the best one.
You've got the full picture. Here's the five-step recap, in order:
We update this page as NEET 2026 dates and cutoffs are confirmed — the re-exam cycle is moving, and stale guidance is worse than none. Bookmark it, and rely on neet.nta.nic.in and mcc.nic.in for anything official.
Last verified: May 2026. NEET UG 2026 re-exam confirmed for June 21, 2026. All post-result dates are estimates until officially announced by NTA and MCC. Cutoff, marks-vs-rank, and seat figures are indicative ranges drawn from NEET 2023–2025 cycles; the 2026 re-exam introduces additional uncertainty. This guide supports planning and does not replace official sources or guarantee admission.
15% of MBBS/BDS government seats fall under AIQ (All India Quota), centrally counseled by MCC. The remaining 85% are state quota, counseled by your home state. Select your state to see both sets of opportunities.
Yes — we include private college cutoffs wherever data is available in our database.
AYUSH (BAMS, BHMS, BUMS) college cutoffs are available separately under AYUSH-NEET-Counselling predictor.
It’s a data-driven online tool that uses your NEET All India Rank, category, and domicile state to generate a personalised list of medical, dental, and AYUSH colleges where you have a realistic chance of admission. It works by analysing years of MCC and state counselling cutoff data.
No predictor is 100% accurate because counselling outcomes depend on real-time human decisions. However, a good predictor that updates with the latest MCC rounds and state cutoffs can be 80–90% directionally accurate, especially for ‘High Chance’ colleges.
Many trusted platforms like Careers360, CollegeDunia, Shiksha, and Edufever offer free versions with full core functionality. Some may offer premium features like personalised counselling or advanced reports, but you can get a solid college list without paying.
Yes. The best predictors allow you to enter your state of domicile and will then show state quota closing ranks alongside All India Quota data. Just make sure you select your correct home state, as cutoffs differ significantly.
Use it as soon as NTA declares your All India Rank. That’s when you’ll enter your exact rank. Also revisit the tool after each MCC or state counselling round (Round 1, Round 2, Mop-Up) because fresh cutoffs may change your chances and help you reorder your preference list.
The top predictors include BDS, BAMS, BHMS, and sometimes BUMS and BSMS courses. When entering your preferences, you can select which courses interest you, and the tool will expand the list accordingly.
In government medical colleges, 85% of seats are reserved for state quota. The closing rank for state quota in your home state can be thousands of ranks lower than the All India Quota closing for the same college. Entering the correct state ensures you see all realistic possibilities.
Don’t stop at the list. Research each college’s NMC recognition status, patient inflow for clinical exposure, fee structure (especially for deemed universities), and campus infrastructure. Use the list to build your MCC or state counselling preference order with ambitious choices at the top and safe ones at the bottom.
A good one shows you a college list from your rank without forcing a login or OTP before results. The AG predictor does. Be wary of any tool that walls your own numbers behind a phone-number form before showing anything useful.
Reliable for broad bands, mid-range ranks, and stable colleges; unreliable at borderline ranks, top colleges with few seats, brand-new colleges, and in disrupted years. Treat it as a probability band, cross-checked against official cutoff PDFs. In 2026, expect higher uncertainty because of the re-exam.
There's no single number — it depends entirely on category, quota, and state. As a 2025 reference, General-category government MBBS via AIQ closed near AIR 26,000 (~525 marks). State quota is often far more favourable for in-state candidates, and reserved-category category ranks change the picture substantially.
Around 600 marks historically maps to roughly AIR 16,000–27,000 (General, expected band), with the 2026 re-exam widening it. That typically opens state-quota government MBBS and reserved-category AIQ government MBBS; General AIQ at established colleges is tighter.
For General it's tight via AIQ but realistic via favourable state quotas; for OBC/EWS it's achievable, especially in-state; for SC/ST it's comfortable in many states. It also reliably opens government BDS and government AYUSH across categories.
For 500: State-quota-dependent for General government MBBS; opens government BDS/AYUSH broadly. If you got around 450: General government MBBS unlikely, but government BDS, AYUSH, and private/deemed MBBS are real. For 400: Private/deemed MBBS, BDS, AYUSH, nursing, and vetted abroad routes. None of these are dead ends — they're legitimate medical careers.
BDS cutoffs run lower than MBBS. Government BDS for General opened around AIR 55,000+ (~497 marks) in 2025; top dental institutes demand much higher. State quota and category ranks shift this meaningfully.
Yes — through favourable state quotas, strong category ranks, government BDS, and government AYUSH. The "government MBBS needs 600+" line is a national-pool generalisation that ignores state quota and category, where the real opportunities for moderate ranks live.
AIQ is 15% of government seats, run nationally by MCC, no domicile bar. State quota is 85%, run by your state, usually requiring domicile. The same college closes at different ranks under each — state quota is often much kinder to in-state candidates.
The re-exam is June 21, 2026. Result is tentatively late June–early July; MCC counselling likely from July, running into October, with state counselling following. All post-result dates are estimates until officially announced — track neet.nta.nic.in and mcc.nic.in.
Your registration, candidature, and centre choices carry forward automatically — no re-registration, fees refunded, fresh admit cards issued. What it resets is certainty: the new paper makes prediction shakier, so plan with wider safety margins this year.
Percentage is your marks out of 720 as a percent. Percentile is the share of candidates you scored at or above. The qualifying cutoff is percentile-based (50th UR, 40th reserved) — it is not "50% marks." This confusion is extremely common and worth getting right.
No. Enter expected marks (from the answer key and your response sheet) to get an estimated rank and college list before the official result — useful for early counselling planning, with the usual caveat that pre-result estimates are looser.
Some institutions maintain horizontal gender reservations, which can shift effective closing ranks for women at those colleges. A thorough predictor accounts for it where it applies.
Largely in private and deemed colleges: management quota seats carry higher fees with lower cutoffs; NRI quota seats are reserved for NRI/NRI-sponsored candidates at premium fees. Both are legitimate routes for those who fit the eligibility and budget.
No tool is perfectly accurate. The right one uses recent all-rounds data, covers AIQ and state separately, converts category ranks, returns probability bands, and states its limits honestly. Judge by method and transparency, not by ranking position or marketing claims.
Content verified by Shaswat Manoj Jha, Admission Guardian.