NIET Business School’s NIRF 2026 PG outcomes
The clearest cohort table currently available for NIET Business School is the “Placement & Higher Studies” section of its NIRF 2026 Management submission. The document identifies the submitted institute as Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology Business School, Greater Noida, code IR-M-C-46254. Its table covers “PG [2 Years Program(s)]”; it does not split outcomes by specialisation or isolate students who studied through the Sunstone partnership.
These are the three PG two-year rows shown in the NIRF submission. The median is reported in rupees for placed graduates. It is not the average or highest salary, and the table does not break the salary figure into fixed pay, variable pay, benefits or take-home pay. Do not use the figures as a promise for a later batch.
Intake years and result years are different
NIRF places two academic-year columns in each row. The first is the year students entered the programme; the second is the year associated with the graduation and placement outcomes. For example, the 2023-24 intake row pairs with 2024-25 outcomes. That row reports 240 graduates in the minimum stipulated time, 216 placed and 23 selected for higher studies. The year 2024-25 is the outcome year, not the admission year.
The “graduates in minimum stipulated time” count is the denominator NIRF prints beside the placed count. The report does not state in this table how many students were eligible for placements, actively seeking work, or participating in placement activities. A ratio of placed students to that graduation count would therefore be a calculation on a different denominator, not an official placement rate. The higher-studies count is a separate column; the submission does not say whether that group overlaps with the placed count, so the two figures should not be added or treated as mutually exclusive.
The median is the middle reported salary among placed graduates; it is not the average and does not describe salaries received by everyone in the graduating cohort. The NIRF table does not report an average package, highest package, recruiter count, role mix or placement-rate formula. In the first two rows, placed students equal the count graduating in minimum time, but that still does not establish the share of all students who sought or were eligible for placement. Use the report for the measures it actually supplies and request the full 2024-26 placement report for the later batch listing.
The NIRF figures are institute-level data for the two-year PG programme category. The source does not identify a particular PGDM specialisation or a Sunstone-only subgroup. They can help a reader understand the submitted history of the Business School’s PG cohort, but they cannot predict an individual student’s result or compare one specialisation against another.
What the current placement page does and does not say
The NIET Business School placement page currently displays ₹12.5 lakh as the highest package, ₹7.6 lakh as the average package and 150+ recruiting companies. It also says the current graduating-batch placement process is underway and that those figures may be updated when it is complete. The captured page does not name that graduating batch beside the figures or publish the count of eligible and participating students. Treat these as provisional page headlines, not final cohort results or a basis for calculating a placement rate.
The school’s mandatory disclosure page lists a “Placement Report 2026” for the PGDM batch 2024-26. That identifies a later report as available from the institution, but the NIRF table above itself ends with 2024-25 outcomes. Keep the periods separate: do not relabel the 2024-25 NIRF row as a 2024-26 batch result, and do not attribute the page’s unlabelled headline figures to that batch without the report’s exact table and denominator.
Questions to ask before comparing offers
When the admissions team shares the 2024-26 placement report or a newer cohort update, ask for the full batch size, students eligible for placement, students who opted in, placed students, and the date on which the report was finalized. Ask whether the reported salary values are annual fixed compensation, total CTC or another measure, and whether the average and highest figures cover the same cohort and compensation basis. Request the distribution or median as well as headline highs; a single maximum does not describe the typical outcome.
Also check whether the report groups the full NIET Business School PGDM cohort or separates specialisations, campuses, study partners or recruiting routes. The NIRF table is useful precisely because it names its PG two-year category and outcome years. The public placement page gives current headline figures but not enough cohort detail to reconcile them with that table. Keep those sources side by side until NIET Business School publishes a clearly dated and fully scoped cohort report.