Loading Admission Guardian content
Loading Admission Guardian content

11 programmes · 1 institution. Check the admission year and requirements.

11 programmes · 1 institution. Check the admission year and requirements.
Read the published admission guide below. Keep each programme, admission year and counselling-merit scale separate when interpreting historical figures.
Compare cutoffs for the same course, quota, category, domicile and round.
A “cutoff” can mean a minimum eligibility mark, a qualifying test score, the last score or rank admitted, or the point at which a cohort filled. Those are different measures. The official undergraduate pages reviewed for the July 2027 intake describe programme-specific school eligibility and assessments. They do not provide a common rank-wise closing table comparable to JoSAA or state counselling for these courses. This guide therefore does not invent a score, rank or historical trend. ATLAS undergraduate admissions
For ATLAS, use “minimum marks” only for the stated Grade XII threshold and subject requirements. Treat tests, portfolios and interviews as selection stages: the reviewed pages do not publish score-to-offer conversion tables or a guaranteed qualifying score. A student meeting the minimum eligibility condition may still need to complete the remaining assessment and wait for a selection decision. Ask the school whether any unpublished test benchmark or seat-availability rule applies to the exact degree and intake.
The school-specific pages are the useful source for the programme route. A central page may summarize several schools or cycles. If a general page conflicts with the dedicated school page, do not silently merge the two; request confirmation from the programme admissions team and save its response.
The reviewed school pages describe these pathways for Indian Grade XII applicants. The numbers below are eligibility thresholds, not published competitive cutoffs or guaranteed admission scores:
Sources: B.Des, B.Tech, BBA, B.Sc., and BBA LL.B..
The table summarizes the routes reviewed on 1 November 2026; it is not a promise that every programme is open in every round. It also does not establish how a board converts grades, whether a subject combination is equivalent, or whether an applicant who meets the minimum will receive an offer. Use the dedicated current page for your exact school and degree, then ask admissions to confirm your board, subjects, and assessment requirements in writing.
ATLAS’s B.Sc. admissions section states a 50% threshold with Mathematics. An FAQ on the same official site says B.Sc. Finance requires 60% and Mathematics. The material reviewed does not explain whether the FAQ describes a programme-specific exception, an older rule or a separate applicant category. This is a genuine source conflict; do not choose the lower threshold and assume it governs Finance, or treat the higher number as universal to all B.Sc. options. B.Sc. admissions
Ask ISME to confirm the minimum for the exact B.Sc. specialization and the July 2027 intake, whether the percentage is calculated from all Grade XII subjects or specified subjects, and how an applicant’s board and Mathematics result are assessed. Ask whether the rule changes for international curricula or applicants awaiting final results. Retain the written reply with the application. If a live application portal uses a different threshold from the programme page or FAQ, pause before payment and request correction or clarification.
The conflict is about eligibility, not a selection-test cutoff. Even after the school confirms eligibility, the applicant should separately verify the required assessment, interview, available seats and any offer conditions.
ATLAS’s reviewed undergraduate routes use internal programme-specific assessments rather than a common public counselling allocation table. A JEE, CUET, CLAT or state rank should not be converted into an ATLAS cutoff unless the current page for the exact programme explicitly says that rank is used. The admission pages reviewed instead name design, technical, business, science and law assessment steps. ATLAS undergraduate admissions
A reported test minimum, if the school supplies one, would still need its date, programme, test version, category or applicant pool, and whether it is a qualifying threshold or the score of the last admitted student. A score from one assessment cannot be carried across B.Des, B.Tech, BBA, B.Sc. and law. Portfolio quality and interview decisions are not summarized by a single numerical score in the reviewed pages.
Do not use third-party “cutoff” estimates without a source table showing the institution’s own score or rank, applicant category and intake year. A coaching site’s predicted threshold, an individual testimonial or an admissions advertisement is not an official closing cutoff. If the university does not publish a historical score distribution, say so and make the admissions decision using the published eligibility criteria and confirmed assessment route.
These steps help you avoid confusing a minimum with a closing score. They cannot predict selection because the reviewed official pages do not publish a complete score distribution, applicant denominator or seat-by-seat closing list.
The reviewed official pages do not provide a common ATLAS cut-off table, closing ranks, prior-year assessment score distributions, applicant-to-seat ratios, or guaranteed qualifying scores for each programme. They also do not establish how interview, portfolio and test components are weighted into a final offer decision. This page should not be read as evidence that ATLAS never uses an internal benchmark; it records only what was available in the official pages reviewed for this cycle.
For an exact answer, ask the admissions office for the current programme-specific eligibility and selection rubric, whether any minimum test score is mandatory, and whether the school can share prior-year anonymized score ranges. If it cannot share a cutoff, ask how selection is communicated and how long an application remains active. For a programme with limited seats or multiple assessment rounds, confirm how later applications are considered without assuming a first-round score is a universal benchmark.
The published minimums and tests are useful for deciding whether to prepare an application. They do not support a numerical admission prediction. Use the official admissions portal for current round status and contact the school for unresolved eligibility or assessment questions before paying an application fee.