What the available placement evidence covers
Placement information for the Delhi School of Economics (DSE) campus must be separated by administering programme. The Department of Commerce runs MBA (Business Analytics), MBA (International Business) and MBA (Human Resource Development), while DSE's constituent departments include Economics, Geography and Sociology. The official placement evidence captured for this refresh is a 2025 MBA Business Analytics report. It is not a DSE-wide result and does not establish outcomes for MBA IB, MBA HRD or the M.A. programmes.
The Business Analytics page reports a batch size of 54, an average package of ₹13 lakh per annum and a highest package of ₹23.5 lakh per annum. It also displays a role distribution. These are programme-specific figures published by the programme site. The available report does not provide a clearly usable placement-rate denominator, a median, or enough detail to treat the batch size as the number of students who sought or accepted placement. The average and highest figure therefore describe reported compensation values, not the probability that a future student will receive an offer.
Reading the MBA Business Analytics figures
The difference between the reported highest and average is ₹10.5 lakh per annum. The highest figure is an upper-end outcome; it should not be used as a typical salary. The average is more representative than the top offer but can still move when a small number of offers are unusually high or low. Without a median and a denominator showing how many eligible students participated, the page does not allow a reader to estimate the distribution or placement percentage.
The report lists a batch size of 54. That is useful context but not automatically the number of placement-seeking students. Students may pursue further study, entrepreneurship, family businesses, internships or other paths; the published page does not specify the number who opted into placement, completed the process, received offers or accepted them. For a rigorous comparison with another MBA, ask whether both reports use the same cohort year, definition of batch, participating-student denominator, salary basis and treatment of multiple offers.
Package values should also be compared on a consistent basis. “Per annum” is retained here because the programme page presents annual package figures. The available page does not establish whether each number is fixed pay, total compensation or another salary measure, and this article does not infer the composition. Before using the figures in a financial return calculation, ask the Department how it defines package and whether the reported amount includes variable pay or other components.
Roles and curriculum fit
The Business Analytics placement page shows role distribution, but its numbers should remain attached to that programme and 2025 cycle. The MBA curriculum describes analytics work involving Python and R, AI/ML, big data and visualisation, as well as core management courses, electives and opportunities for an internship, live projects and a capstone. That makes it sensible for a prospective student to compare target roles with the actual course plan and project work. It does not prove that every graduate enters an analytics job or that a specific sector will hire from a future cohort.
Applicants considering MBA (IB) or MBA (HRD) should use programme-specific evidence. Their curricula differ from Business Analytics: IB covers international trade, marketing, finance and supply-chain subjects; HRD covers human-resource development, organisational behaviour, labour relations, HR analytics and related topics. A BA average or highest offer cannot be transferred to those degrees simply because they share a campus and Department. No current official IB or HRD outcome report was captured for this update.
The same caution applies to DSE's M.A. programmes. The MBA Business Analytics report does not describe their placement outcomes. Candidates should seek outcomes from the relevant department or compare independent employment data for the same degree and cohort. Where the responsible unit does not publish a denominator or salary basis, keep the gap explicit rather than filling it with an institution-wide estimate.
Questions to ask the Department
Before treating the 2025 figures as a decision point, ask for a current cohort report that states the graduating year, batch size, number eligible and number participating in placements, offers made and accepted, median and average, highest offer, salary definition, and any excluded students. For programme comparisons, request the same fields separately for IB, HRD and Business Analytics. Also ask how internships, pre-placement offers and multiple offers are counted, and whether the published role or sector percentages use offers, students or some other denominator.
These questions are not a criticism of the published figures; they identify what the page does and does not show. The 2025 report provides a useful Business Analytics compensation snapshot, but not a verified placement rate or a full distribution. Applicants should combine it with the curriculum, admission route and actual fee schedule, then compare it with similarly scoped reports from other programmes.
A careful comparison checklist
- Match programme and cohort: MBA Business Analytics 2025 is not MBA IB, MBA HRD or all of DSE.
- Check the denominator: ask how many students were eligible, participated, received offers and accepted them.
- Compare median with average and ask what the package includes; neither the top offer nor one mean explains the distribution.
- Match role and sector definitions: percentages may be based on offers or students, and the available page does not make every denominator explicit.
- Keep the academic year visible. A 2025 report is historical evidence, not a guarantee or forecast for a later batch.
The strongest supported conclusion is narrow: the Department of Commerce MBA Business Analytics page reports 54 students in the 2025 batch, a ₹13 lakh per annum average and a ₹23.5 lakh per annum highest package, alongside a role distribution. A current placement rate, median and comparable IB/HRD outcomes remain unverified in the sources captured here. A prospective student should request those programme-specific details before using placement data to rank offers or estimate return on fees.






















![Fair Isaac and Company [FICO]](https://assets.admissionguardian.com/imgproxy/insecure/w:64/h:64/rt:fit/el:0/f:avif/q:82/sm:1/plain/local%3A%2F%2F%2Fimages%2Frecruiter_logos%2Ffair-isaac-and-company-fico-logo.webp)







































