Latest PGP outcomes: Batch 2024-26
IIM Rohtak’s placement page lists a Final Placement Report for 2026. The linked report did not open during this check, so the latest figures below are attributed to Shiksha’s placement page, which identifies its download as the institute’s 2026 report. Treat them as a transcription of institute-reported results and confirm the PDF directly before using a single number to make a decision.
These are final-placement figures for the 2024-26 PGP cohort. They are not a guaranteed salary, an offer available to every student, or an outcome for IIM Rohtak’s IPM or IPL participants. The “100%” description is institute-reported and should be read within the report’s own eligible-student denominator.
The overall average sits ₹2.03 lakh above the median. That gap means the mean is pulled upward by higher offers; the median is the more useful single figure for understanding the midpoint of reported outcomes. The highest offer is a ceiling reached by an individual, not a likely or typical salary.
What the 2026 domain split says
Shiksha’s transcription reports Consulting as the largest placement domain by offer share, at 28%. Finance had a slightly higher average CTC than Consulting, while General Management & HR recorded the highest domain-level offer. The distinction matters: the most common function and the function with the highest average or single top offer are different questions.
The five reported shares sum to 100%. They describe the distribution of placements across these functions, not the percentage of students who qualify for a particular role. A domain average is not a starting salary promise: it aggregates offers within that function and may include different employers, seniority, variable pay and benefits under the CTC label.
For role fit, use the function labels as a map of where offers were reported, then compare actual job descriptions, location, fixed pay, variable components and joining conditions. The institute’s report index and placement office are the responsible places to check for the full report, recruiting process and any later corrections.
Compare the three latest final-placement reports carefully
The institute’s 2024 and 2025 reports and the 2026 report transcription show why one year’s highest offer should not stand in for the whole trend.
On these headline figures, the 2026 average is ₹1.30 lakh, or about 6.9%, above 2025; the median is ₹1 lakh, about 5.9%, higher. These are calculations from the reported values, not a forecast. The highest CTC fell sharply from the 2024 peak and then rose in 2026, reinforcing why it is a poor stand-alone comparison.
Batch sizes also changed: the 2025 report calls 386 the largest batch to date, while the 2026 transcription lists 303 students. Recruiter counts, PPOs and package statistics should therefore be read with their specific cohort labels. They do not establish why a metric changed, and they cannot be used to predict the 2027-28 graduating cohort.
NIRF outcomes are a separate reporting series
IIM Rohtak’s NIRF 2025 Management submission reports placements for two-year postgraduate programmes using graduating academic years. It records all reported graduates as placed in each row, no students selected for higher studies, and the median salary shown below. The amounts are rupees per year in the NIRF reporting context.
The NIRF table also shows the corresponding first-year intake/admission columns, but those are not the graduating or placement counts. For example, 2023-24 intake/admissions were 264/262, while the same row reports 227 graduates and 227 placed. Keep these measures distinct.
There is a material difference between the last NIRF row and the PGP 2022-24 final-placement report: NIRF lists a 2023-24 median of ₹19.27 lakh, while the institute’s placement report gives that cohort a ₹17 lakh median and ₹19.27 lakh average. The public sources do not explain the mismatch. Preserve both source labels and do not silently replace one with the other. For a graduating-cohort comparison, check the definitions and eligible-student denominator in the original documents.
Summer internships are not final salary packages
The official Summer Placement Report for PGP Batch 2024-26 reports a ₹1.20 lakh median stipend, ₹1.21 lakh average stipend and ₹3.60 lakh highest stipend. It also lists ₹2,24,085 for the top 10%, ₹1,88,855 for the top 25% and ₹1,55,914 for the top 50%. These are stipend amounts for the summer internship process, not annual final-placement CTC.
The report describes participation from a broad recruiter set and includes organizations such as Morgan Stanley, McDonald’s, DESRI and Haleon. Recruiter logos or names show participation, not the number of offers made by each employer or the probability that an individual student will receive one.
Before comparing two schools, compare the same type of result and period: final-placement average against final-placement average, median against median, and summer stipend against summer stipend. Ask whether the amount is fixed pay or CTC, whether the denominator is all students or eligible students, and which graduating cohort the figure covers. Use the latest published report as historical evidence; only the next batch’s official placement report can establish its outcomes.