What the published figures can tell you
For applicants considering BBA or BCA, the strongest comparable outcome figures found are in the institution’s NIRF 2025 submission. It reports outcomes for its UG three-year programmes as a group, rather than separate BBA and BCA tables. A different, newer page on the ITS UG site lists BBA/BCA student-employer captions for the 2023-26 batch, but gives no batch denominator, salary range or placement rate. Read the two sources as different evidence: one has counts and a median salary but broader programme scope; the other names examples but is not a statistical report.
*Admission Guardian calculation: students reported placed divided by students graduating in minimum stipulated time, rounded to one decimal. The source reports the counts; it does not label this quotient as a placement rate. It also does not provide programme-wise or gender-wise outcomes in the cited table. Read the NIRF 2025 submission.
How to interpret the counts
The reported placed count and median salary should not be collapsed into one promise. The median applies only to the placed graduates in the reported group; it is not a starting salary for every BBA or BCA student. The NIRF table also records higher-study selections separately. For the 2023-24 row, 378 students are listed as selected for higher studies alongside 146 placed and 524 graduating in minimum time. Do not add those counts together or treat them as mutually exclusive without a source explaining the categories.
The three rows show a marked decline in the placed-to-graduate quotient, from 67.7% to 27.9%, while the median salary stayed between ₹3.50L and ₹3.73L. That is a useful signal to investigate, not proof that placement access caused the change: the submission does not explain the cohort composition, recruiting conditions, eligibility rules, off-campus outcomes or how higher-study choices relate to placements. The denominator is graduates in minimum stipulated time, not total enrolment or all students who sought work.
Recruiter names and the newer BBA/BCA gallery
The official Final Placement page labels a BBA-BCA Placement 2023-26 section and presents individual student-employer captions. Examples shown on that page include Infosys, UCERTIFY, Tommy Hilfiger and Tech Mahindra. The page also retains earlier batch headings, including 2022-25, 2021-24 and 2020-23. These are useful leads about employers represented in the gallery, but captions do not tell you how many students were eligible, interviewed, offered jobs or joined. They also do not establish a role mix or a package for any whole batch.
Treat a named employer as an example of a reported student outcome, not as a guarantee that the employer recruits every year or hires across both degrees. The accessible gallery does not consistently identify whether a person studied BBA or BCA, the job title, location, offer date, salary, or whether the offer was on-campus. No defensible average or highest package can be calculated from it. The figures in the NIRF table are therefore the better source for a broad outcome comparison, while the gallery is better used as a prompt for questions about recent employers and roles.
What the placement evidence does not establish
The public material reviewed does not provide a separate, dated BBA placement report and BCA placement report with compatible definitions. It does not show a recent programme-level placement rate, median or average salary, highest salary, internship conversion rate, job-function distribution, employer-by-employer offer count or the number of students who declined offers. The NIRF submission is not a substitute for those missing BBA/BCA breakouts because it reports the UG three-year programme group together.
The NIRF measure is also specific: “students graduating in minimum stipulated time” and “students placed” are its denominator and numerator labels. It should not be compared directly with a college that reports placements as a share of all final-year students or eligible students. Salary is reported in rupees as a median for placed graduates; the document does not describe fixed versus variable pay or whether the figure is annual CTC. Confirm the definition before comparing it with a recruiter’s advertised package.
Preparation and questions to ask before enrolling
ITS’s programme page describes BBA activities such as career counselling, personality development, guest lectures, industry visits, workshops and boot camps. These are institutional descriptions of learning activities, not measured placement outcomes. Ask how often each activity runs, which students can participate, and whether participation is included in course fees before treating it as a career service.
Before paying a non-refundable amount, ask the admissions or placement office for the latest completed BBA and BCA placement reports separately. Request the report year, graduating and eligible-student counts, students placed, students pursuing higher studies, median salary, and whether salary means fixed pay or total CTC. Ask for recruiter names together with the number of offers and roles, and whether each role is on-campus, off-campus or internship-to-job conversion. Request the same definitions for at least two recent batches so you can compare like with like.
For your own shortlist, compare the reported median with the total cost of attendance and the type of work you want. A broad UG figure can help frame that discussion, but it cannot predict an individual BBA or BCA offer. Until ITS publishes programme-specific denominators and outcome measures, use the official NIRF figures as institution-level context and the BBA/BCA gallery as a set of examples, not as a placement guarantee.