This refresh uses AIT’s official NIRF 2025 submission for completed UG and PG cohorts, with the institute’s dated placement brochure and prospectus shown separately. The figures describe past reporting periods. The newest completed NIRF cohort captured is 2023-24; these reports do not establish outcomes for students currently seeking jobs. Read each table with its programme level, year and measure intact.
What the official reports measure
AIT’s NIRF 2025 Engineering submission is the clearest source captured here for programme-scoped placement counts and medians. It reports four-year undergraduate cohorts and two-year postgraduate cohorts separately, with the graduation year, students graduating in minimum stipulated time, students placed, median salary of placed graduates and higher-study counts. These are historical submissions, not live progress for the current batch.
The institute’s 2024-25 placement brochure presents different measures: aggregate placement percentages, average and highest salaries, company examples and campus activity. AIT’s 2025 prospectus separately states that 94% of the 2023-24 batch was placed with an average salary of ₹11 lakh per annum. The captured sources do not define the same denominator or reporting basis for all these numbers. Read each in its own terms. An average salary is not an NIRF median, and a percentage from one report should not be assumed to use the same eligible-student pool as another.
The NIRF rows also pair these graduation years with earlier first-year admission cohorts: 2018-19 for the 2021-22 graduates, 2019-20 for 2022-23, and 2020-21 for 2023-24. The report labels the outcomes as students who graduated in minimum stipulated time. That specific definition matters: it is not necessarily the same population as all students who registered for campus placements, nor does the table state the share of every enrolled student who secured an offer. The report includes both placed counts and median salary, so readers can see the scale of each reported cohort instead of relying on a salary headline alone.
NIRF 2025: four-year undergraduate cohorts
The NIRF table labels these as UG programmes of four years. It also provides an earlier intake year alongside each graduation cohort; the table above follows the graduation year, which is the period relevant to the reported outcome. The median is not an average, a maximum or a guaranteed individual offer. NIRF counts are submitted by the institute and the displayed table does not break them down by engineering branch.
The PG rows are especially small. In the 2021-22 graduation row, the report lists 3 students graduating in minimum time, 0 placed, median 0 and 0 selected for higher studies. The 2022-23 row lists 0 in those fields, and the 2023-24 row does the same. A zero median in a row with no placed students is not an entry-level salary offer; it signals that the report records no placed graduate for that cohort. The table is aggregated across two-year PG programmes, so it cannot support comparisons among specialisations.
NIRF 2025: two-year postgraduate cohorts
The same submission has a separate PG table for two-year programmes. It records three minimum-time graduates for 2021-22, with zero placed, a zero median reported and zero selected for higher studies. Its following rows show zero minimum-time graduates, zero placed and zero higher-study selections for 2022-23 and 2023-24; where no students were placed, the submitted median is shown as zero. These small cohort rows should not be read as a branch-level placement rate or as a current PG outlook. The report does not identify individual postgraduate specialisations in this placement table.
Averages can be pulled upward by a small number of higher offers, while a median marks the middle of the placed-graduate distribution. A brochure’s highest salary is a maximum, not a likely result. That is why the ₹112.14L highest figure and ₹14.70L average for 2021-22 should remain distinct from the NIRF ₹12L median. Similarly, the prospectus’s 94% and ₹11L average for the 2023-24 batch are a separate institution statement; the captured excerpt does not specify its denominator or how it relates to NIRF’s 334 minimum-time graduates.
What the placement brochure adds
AIT’s placement brochure lists aggregate placement percentages of 90% in 2018-19, 92% in 2019-20, 91% in 2020-21, 97% in 2021-22 and 96% in 2022-23. It pairs those years with average and highest salary figures. For 2021-22, for example, it reports ₹14.70L average and ₹112.14L highest; for 2022-23 it reports ₹14.20L average and ₹52L highest. Those average and maximum figures do not contradict the NIRF medians of ₹12L and ₹12.5L for the same graduation years: the measures answer different questions.
The brochure also names industry partners and describes placement and internship drives. These examples show institutional engagement, not a promise that each company recruits every year or that every student receives an internship or offer. The captured brochure text does not provide a branch-wise placement table, so its aggregate percentages should not be assigned to Computer Engineering, IT or another branch.
When you ask for a current report, request the academic year, programme level and branch, number eligible for placement, number registered, number placed, definition of placement, median and average separately, and whether the results are final or ongoing. Internship participation, employer visits, offers and unique students placed are different measures. If the institute publishes only a headline percentage, do not infer a branch-level count or turn it into a guarantee. The official reports captured here are useful for historical context; they cannot predict a student’s individual salary or hiring outcome.