Loading Admission Guardian content
Loading Admission Guardian content
Explore the available options or ask for admission guidance.
Explore the available options or ask for admission guidance.
Compare 33 available cutoff records across 1 exam, with course, category, counselling round and year kept separate.
Compare cutoffs for the same course, quota, category, domicile and round.
Compare your result with recorded cutoffs for I.T.S. Check current programme eligibility separately.
Use UPTAC College Predictor1
2022-2025
7
33
Institute of Technology and Science (I.T.S) (I.T.S) in Uttar Pradesh has historical cutoff records for UPTAC on this page. There is no single cutoff for the whole college: read each course, category, quota and round separately. Coverage below reflects the records on this page.
The latest recorded year is 2025. 6 records in that group cover 1 named category. Across the available years, 7 distinct course labels are recorded.
Showing 5 of 6 profiles, ordered by course and category. Browse every loaded record in the full table above.
Recorded years: 2022-2025. Year changes appear only for single closing values with matching course, category, quota, round, counselling context and unit.
Turn your exam result into a college shortlist. Enter your result and category to see your preview, then verify your mobile to unlock more.
Use UPTAC College PredictorThe latest opening-and-closing-rank document currently listed on the Uttar Pradesh Technical Admission Counselling (UPTAC) website is for the 2025 session. Its OR-CR index dates the PG file to 15 September 2025. The exact downloadable report timed out during this research, so the figures below are attributed to an opened secondary table and should be checked against the official UPTAC PG rank report before making a final choice.
For ITS Ghaziabad MBA, Collegedunia’s opened UPTAC 2025 table reports a General-category closing rank of 45,955 in Round 1 and 35,852 in Round 3. It lists the same values across its six MBA specialisation labels: Finance, Human Resource Management, Information Technology, International Business, Marketing and Operations Management. For General Girl, it reports 37,341 in Round 1 and no Round 3 figure. These are reported closing ranks, not marks or percentile cut-offs. The secondary table does not establish why the specialisation rows share values, and a dash is not evidence of a zero-seat result. Treat the rows as counselling outcomes, not a separate preference ranking among specialisations.
The Round 3 General closing rank is numerically lower than Round 1. That does not mean every applicant with a rank up to 35,852 was eligible or would have received a seat: category, quota, programme mapping, choice order, eligibility and the availability of seats all affect an allotment. The General Girl figure is a different seat pool and should not be compared with the General figure as though only the round had changed. The opened secondary table gives a useful historic reference, but the official row is the authority for an application decision.
UPTAC’s own explanation says institute-wise allotment results and opening and closing ranks are published after each round. A cutoff therefore belongs to a particular counselling session, course, round and seat category or quota. It is not a permanent admission requirement set once by ITS. A number copied without those labels can hide the most important part of the comparison.
Before comparing two entries, match the year, exact programme, round, quota, category and gender pool. Also confirm whether the row represents fresh allotments or includes candidates carried forward from an earlier round. Do not mix an MBA entry with MCA, MBA Lateral or another institution’s ITS-named campus. The official rank report may present the programme in a counselling category rather than the institute’s marketing specialisation names; match the actual course name and institute code, not just a similar label.
Opening and closing ranks describe the endpoints of the reported allotment range for that row. The closing rank is the last rank shown in that category and round, not a promise that a candidate with that number will be allotted a seat next year. A larger closing-rank number means the round reached a numerically later rank in that pool. It does not by itself measure teaching quality, placement outcomes, demand across all applicants or the value of the MBA. Nor should a later round automatically be treated as a better prediction: vacancies, withdrawals, new choices and counselling rules can change the set of seats and candidates.
Start from the UPTAC OR-CR page and select the PG Opening and Closing Ranks 2025 item when researching that historic session. Confirm that the displayed document is for the 2025 session and the institute row says ITS Ghaziabad. Check the programme and every available category, quota and round column before copying a value. If the report has several rows for ITS, keep them separate unless its own labels show they share the same scope.
For a live allotment, use the UPTAC result instructions. The counselling authority says candidates log in with their roll number and password to view the individual result and download a provisional allotment letter. That candidate-specific record is the right place to confirm the rank details and actual allotment attached to your account; a public closing-rank table cannot replace it. Avoid sharing login credentials or personal allotment documents with anyone offering to predict a guaranteed seat.
After each allotment round, UPTAC says it publishes the institute-wise result and opening and closing ranks. Check the round-specific result and notice rather than relying on an old screenshot or a table that does not state its update date. Read the official information bulletin for eligibility, document requirements, fees and any counselling deadlines. A closing rank alone does not show whether you satisfy the degree, category-document or other conditions, and this page does not establish current-year rules.
The 2025 figures can help you understand the scale and category dependence of prior ITS MBA allotments. They should not be converted into a 2027–28 target. As of this research, the official OR-CR index lists a 2025 PG rank document; this review did not establish an official UPTAC 2027–28 cutoff or a later ITS-specific rank publication. The publication edition of this guide is 2027–28, but the historical observations remain explicitly labelled 2025. Recheck the official counselling site when the relevant session’s PG rank report is published.
When building a choice list, use the latest official rank table available for the same course and seat pool, then include options that remain acceptable even if the prior closing rank shifts. Keep General and General Girl (or any other category) evidence in separate columns. Do not assume a category benefit unless you are eligible and can produce the required current documents. Rank movement across rounds can inform how the same session’s allotment evolved, but it cannot tell you how many students will choose ITS in a later session.
The UPTAC instructions also make the post-allotment steps consequential: candidates must upload required documents, submit willingness and pay the seat-acceptance fee to retain an allotted seat. The page describes FLOAT as willingness for upgradation and FREEZE as no upgradation. Follow the current bulletin and portal schedule for the choices available in your round. Missing a document or payment step can affect an allotment even when your rank falls within an earlier reported range.
The opened Collegedunia table reports 45,955 in Round 1 and 35,852 in Round 3 for General. These are secondary-source values; confirm them against the official PG Opening and Closing Ranks 2025 report before relying on them. The official report link is listed on UPTAC’s OR-CR page.
No. It is reported for the General pool in Round 3. The secondary table separately reports General Girl at 37,341 in Round 1 and does not give a Round 3 value. Your own category, quota and round must match the row.
No. A past closing rank records one counselling outcome. It does not guarantee an allotment in a different year or override eligibility, choices, seat availability, category documents or current counselling instructions.
Use the UPTAC candidate login and check the individual allotment result and provisional letter. UPTAC’s result instructions say candidates sign in with their roll number and password; a public cutoff table is not an account-specific result.
No. The figures are explicitly for UPTAC 2025. They are historical context only. Check the official site for the rank report corresponding to the future counselling session; do not infer a 2027–28 cutoff from the older table.
