For students comparing I.T.S Ghaziabad’s MBA outcomes, the historical numerical record in this section comes from the previously captured institute-submitted NIRF 2025 Management report. It reports 133 placed graduates out of 214 graduating in minimum stipulated time for 2023–24, with a median salary of ₹4,23,000 among those placed. That is about 62.1% of the reported graduating count, calculated as 133 ÷ 214. The NIRF table is a dated institutional submission, not a promise about an individual student or a 2027–28 cohort.
Historical NIRF 2025 Management report: three graduating cohorts
The link now opens the institute's 2026 submission. The figures below come from the captured 2025 report. It pairs each graduating class with an earlier intake year. The table below preserves those reporting years and denominators.
The 2023–24 row shows 133 ÷ 214, or about 62.1%, placed relative to the number graduating in minimum stipulated time. This is not a placement rate for every enrolled student: it uses the reported graduating count as the denominator, and the table does not state how many students sought jobs, declined offers, or were excluded from placement participation. The “selected for higher studies” count is a separate column; the submission does not explain whether those students overlap with other categories, so do not add it to placements or infer a combined outcome.
Across these three reported cohorts, the median among placed graduates is ₹4,15,000, then ₹4,00,000, then ₹4,23,000. The latest reported median is ₹8,000 above the first and ₹23,000 above the middle value. This is a comparison of three cohort-specific medians, not an average salary trend. A median describes the midpoint of placed graduates’ reported salaries, not the highest offer and not what each student can expect.
Why the report category matters
NIRF’s 2025 Overall submission has a separate row for all PG two-year programmes offered by the institution. For graduating year 2023–24 it reports 329 graduates, 204 placed, median salary ₹3,61,500 and 3 selected for higher studies. That category aggregates programmes; it is not an MCA-only result and should not replace the Management-category figures when assessing MBA outcomes. The difference between the Management and Overall numbers reflects different reporting scopes, not competing estimates of one identical cohort.
The NIRF file identifies these figures as “Submitted Institute Data for NIRF’2025’.” Treat them as the institute’s reported historical outcome data for the named category and years. They do not describe 2024–25 or 2025–26 graduates, and they cannot establish placements for students entering in 2027–28. The table above preserves the historical NIRF 2025 reporting years and should be read as cohort-specific evidence, not as a current submission or a forecast for a new entrant.
MBA and MCA evidence is not equally detailed
The institute’s placement brochures page lists an MCA placement brochure for 2025 and an MBA placement brochure for 2024. These are programme-labelled resources, but the page itself does not state placement totals or salary medians from those brochures. Use a brochure’s figures only when its cohort, period, salary measure and denominator are visible in the document; a recruiter logo or an individual selection announcement is not the same thing as a cohort-wide placement outcome.
The current placements page separates MCA and MBA sections and presents year-labelled placement items. Its gallery is useful for locating institute announcements, but individual announcements do not provide a complete graduating-cohort denominator. In the NIRF report opened for this review, Management-category data provide the more comparable table. The Overall row combines programmes and does not isolate MCA. The reviewed official sources therefore do not establish a separate, current MCA placement rate or median salary for Ghaziabad.
Questions to ask before relying on a placement figure
Ask the institute for the latest programme-specific report and confirm the graduating batch, number graduating, number seeking placements, number placed, and the definition of “placed.” Check whether the salary statistic is a median or average, whether it is based on accepted offers or reported offers, and whether variable pay is included. Ask how higher studies, entrepreneurship, family business, and students who did not participate in placement are counted. The NIRF data supplied here do not answer those questions for each programme.
For the MBA, the 2023–24 NIRF Management result is a useful historical baseline because it supplies a denominator, placed count and median together. It should be read beside the 2021–22 and 2022–23 cohorts rather than as a standalone guarantee. For MCA, request an MCA-specific current batch outcome sheet; do not substitute the Overall two-year PG group or infer programme-level results from a set of placement images. Neither a high package poster nor an institute-wide total can tell an applicant how many peers in the same course and batch received comparable offers.